If you’d like to contribute an essay, article or other post to the blogosphere, but don’t want the hassle of maintaining your own site, send it to the email address listed on Johnny’s profile. If it’s relevant to evolution, ecology or ethology and reasonably comprehensible – it can be posted here!
Nothing is so dangerous to the progress of the human mind than to assume that our views of science are ultimate? I generalized Maxwell's equations to include non-zero rest mass force carrier particles as a linearization of the Klein-Gordon equations (which is what the Dirac equations are, also) as far back as 1986. Yet, the scientific community has ignored them. Yes, they believe their view is already ultimate, even though they can't find a Higgs boson; the Dirac equation predicted the neutrino as its massless instance - yet it appears, now, it is not massless; and hypothesizes but doesn't explain what dark matter and dark energy are - all in a cosmos with four dimensions each of real variable extent but another six or so some other set ("curled up"). How do you even explain how something so complex sprang into being? Anyone interested in real knowledge, not just becoming of high stature, have a look at my equations at: http://www.mathematicalphysicsinstitute.org/
Has any one investigated the energies,associated with mass'm',lying in the region e>mc^2 ('e' greater than mc^2),'e' being the maximum extractable electromagnetic energy in mass'm' and 'c' a constant ;the limiting value of the speed of electromagnetic radiation ? Obviously the superluminal energies wont be extractable from mass .It has always perplexed physics regarding the phenomena of radiation aquiring mass .what impulse generated mass in matter ? These superluminal energies may even be the basis of mass. who knows? Its worth ruling them out or confirming the hunch. you are welcome to discuss with dadsteratgmail.com .
Nothing is so dangerous to the progress of the human mind than to assume that our views of science are ultimate? I generalized Maxwell's equations to include non-zero rest mass force carrier particles as a linearization of the Klein-Gordon equations (which is what the Dirac equations are, also) as far back as 1986. Yet, the scientific community has ignored them. Yes, they believe their view is already ultimate, even though they can't find a Higgs boson; the Dirac equation predicted the neutrino as its massless instance - yet it appears, now, it is not massless; and hypothesizes but doesn't explain what dark matter and dark energy are - all in a cosmos with four dimensions each of real variable extent but another six or so some other set ("curled up"). How do you even explain how something so complex sprang into being? Anyone interested in real knowledge, not just becoming of high stature, have a look at my equations at: http://www.mathematicalphysicsinstitute.org/
ReplyDeleteHas any one investigated the energies,associated with mass'm',lying in the region e>mc^2 ('e' greater than mc^2),'e' being the maximum extractable electromagnetic energy in mass'm' and 'c' a constant ;the limiting value of the speed of electromagnetic radiation ?
ReplyDeleteObviously the superluminal energies wont be extractable from mass .It has always perplexed physics regarding the phenomena of radiation aquiring mass .what impulse generated mass in matter ? These superluminal energies may even be the basis of mass. who knows? Its worth ruling them out or confirming the hunch. you are welcome to discuss with dadsteratgmail.com .